Well said Shital. If there is total transparency in all actions of all individuals and organizations, transparency would prevail and establish true democracy.
See the below post on EU parliament Democracy:
European Parliament votes to increase transparency of decision-making
Madrid/Brussels, Friday 7 March 2014 - Access Info Europe has welcomed thedecision [1] by the European Parliament to bring greater transparency to its decision making by recording and publishing records of final voting in committee. Previously most committee votes were taken by a simple show of hands and were not recorded.
The decision, adopted on 26 February 2014, applies to all final votes on resolutions and legislation. It also makes it compulsory to record and publish the final votes by MEPs in plenary on non-binding resolutions.
"This decision will make it easier for citizens to hold MEPs to account, and to for civil society to track the influence of lobbyists at the committee stage, which is often where decision making actually takes place" said Pam Bartlett Quintanilla, Campaigner at Access Info Europe.
Access Info Europe notes that this decision is in line with the EU Treaties which require the European Parliament to "meet in public ... when considering and voting on a draft legislative act." [2]
Access Info Europe regrets that there other areas of the legislative process remain opaque. The European Parliament missed the opportunity to extend mandatory transparency to voting on amendments.
Another crucial area of law-making which escapes the reach of transparency is that of what are known as "trialogue" negotiations which take place between the Parliament, Council of the EU, and the European Commission. These are informal meetings held with a view to reaching an agreement in the early stages of developing legislation. No record of the discussions is made available to the public.
As the Advocate General of the European Court of Justice stated in his Opinion of 16 May 2013 in the case of Council of the European Union vs. Access Info Europe:
Law-making [is an] activity that in a democratic society can only occur through the use of a procedure that is public in nature and, in that sense, 'transparent'. Otherwise, it would not be possible to ascribe to 'law' the virtue of being the expression of the will of those that must obey it, which is the very foundation of its legitimacy as an indisputable edict.
Best,
Madrid/Brussels, Friday 7 March 2014 - Access Info Europe has welcomed thedecision [1] by the European Parliament to bring greater transparency to its decision making by recording and publishing records of final voting in committee. Previously most committee votes were taken by a simple show of hands and were not recorded.The decision, adopted on 26 February 2014, applies to all final votes on resolutions and legislation. It also makes it compulsory to record and publish the final votes by MEPs in plenary on non-binding resolutions.
"This decision will make it easier for citizens to hold MEPs to account, and to for civil society to track the influence of lobbyists at the committee stage, which is often where decision making actually takes place" said Pam Bartlett Quintanilla, Campaigner at Access Info Europe.
Access Info Europe notes that this decision is in line with the EU Treaties which require the European Parliament to "meet in public ... when considering and voting on a draft legislative act." [2]
Access Info Europe regrets that there other areas of the legislative process remain opaque. The European Parliament missed the opportunity to extend mandatory transparency to voting on amendments.
Another crucial area of law-making which escapes the reach of transparency is that of what are known as "trialogue" negotiations which take place between the Parliament, Council of the EU, and the European Commission. These are informal meetings held with a view to reaching an agreement in the early stages of developing legislation. No record of the discussions is made available to the public.
As the Advocate General of the European Court of Justice stated in his Opinion of 16 May 2013 in the case of Council of the European Union vs. Access Info Europe:
Law-making [is an] activity that in a democratic society can only occur through the use of a procedure that is public in nature and, in that sense, 'transparent'. Otherwise, it would not be possible to ascribe to 'law' the virtue of being the expression of the will of those that must obey it, which is the very foundation of its legitimacy as an indisputable edict.
Best,
Kris Dev
Sent from my iPad
On 07-Mar-2014, at 6:01 am, "shital" <s_shah66@yahoo.com> wrote:
Only reflection of thoughts won't be enough, India needs reformation in all sectors. Policies need to be understood and implemented at all levels. Politicians need to be educated and literate to understand the meaning of law. Please look at the politicians from western countries and try to learn the fundamentals of being good ruler and "Democracy". Please excuse me for being so blunt, wish there was a softer approach to the way things happen in India.
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
------------------------------------
Please visit the website http://www.indiavision2020.org to read inspiring articles of eminent personalitiesYahoo Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/India_Vision_2020/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/India_Vision_2020/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
India_Vision_2020-digest@yahoogroups.com
India_Vision_2020-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
India_Vision_2020-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/
