Dear All,
I realized this when Rahul Ghandhi stating similar idea during his visit to Tamil Nadu. Not sure it's because of one man thinking or collective government thinking or because of political difference.
I am not an expert, but just giving my experience, I am a villager near to
Won't the flood situation be minimized if the rivers were interlinked, won't the people at down corner be satisfied because of this. What we have conserved during this calamity by not linking it.
For me it looks like inertia constraint to step in to the project. We are dreaming to lead with billion, won't happen without any new thinking and effectively utilizing the available resource. I happened to read a beautiful quote "We cannot become what we need to be by remaining what we are. --- Max Depree, American author"
Regards
Velu
From: manjit nath <manjitzing@yahoo.
To: India_Vision_
Sent: Tue, October 6, 2009 5:27:38 PM
Subject: [India_Vision_
HI all, I want to share the news, I found in one local news paper of Assam. The river linking project was one of the most dicussed projects in Vision 2020 and also by Sir Abdul kalam. But this proposal initiated a lot of protests in river-rich states like Assam with mighty Brahmaputra flowing through its heart, where they feared that this will lead to imbalance in the eco-system in case of waters. The recent decision by Govt of India proves the fear of Assamese people to be true, though, it clearly demands some more scientific explanation. Experts, please share your views. Regards, Manjit Nath The article: Centre to shelve river-linking project |
Keep up with people you care about with Yahoo! India Mail. Learn how.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
0 comments:
Post a Comment