To realise the developed India by 2020

Thursday, December 11, 2008

RE: [India_Vision_2020] Re: Human Rights day - Why Human Rights evangelists do not raise their voice against terrorism

Hey everybody,

 

Before starting off with my reply, I must say that this is one of the very few occasions that I have managed to actually reply. However, I have been keenly following the mails I do get and I must say it gladdens my heart that people in India are actually looking beyond the constrictive thinking that the media and the government wants to conform us to.

 

About Human Rights – I feel that it has certainly lost its way. Human rights organizations are not clear where they are and where they should be. Abhorring capital punishment or harboring the same interests of known killers is plain stupid. The world has changed. People have become prone to violence and perverted acts of abuse. The state can only set a precedent to better behavior by instilling fear in those who commit crimes. And yes I completely agree with the line of thread of thought that has preceded this mail.

 

It is strange though – I have argued long and hard with friends of mine as to why capital punishment is required for “the worst crimes of them all” And it is a law of nature that illustrates it best. If you hit a dog on the nose with a newspaper every time it tries to eat a biscuit, soon it will stop going for the biscuit. Metaphorically speaking of course. A harsh penalty always seems to dissuade us – the sane and rational ones at the very least. Human rights advocates have always used the classic defense “what right do we have to take another human’s life?” Well did a killer/terrorist/despot think of that when they committed murder? Is not cold blooded murder one of the worst crimes? And is not treason considered a crime worse than murder? Yet, we have human rights thrown into the mix for protecting their rights. Will human rights play a part if a Hitler or Pol Pot were to stand trial? And wasn’t Pol Pot a despot who slaughtered millions of Cambodians?

 

Human rights is best if it is entirely towards the welfare of humans in civil matters. The moment it becomes a criminal matter, human rights should not play a part. Of course by this I still want an end to police brutality and welfare for prisoners who are undergoing rehabilitation. Human rights is meant at the individual level, rarely with the big picture.

 

@Srinivasan – I don’t think any organization will ever come forward. It is a conflict of interest. And I think the last line of the paragraph above says it all. It is like a Greenpeace volunteer smoking and at the same time being compassionate about the environment. Conflict of interest.

 

Regards,

Vivek.

 

P.S: I seem to have rambled on a bit.

Sir, Well said.
It is an eye opener on human rights. All have to be cautious about
human rights people. My experience with many human rights office
bearers with visiting cards offering different classes of membership
and posts according to the money given at the time of joining.

Aum Murugan

--- In India_Vision_2020@yahoogroups.com, "Prabhakar J"
<jp.sangamam@...> wrote:
>
> sir what you are say is true true true
>
> On 12/10/08, Prime Point Srinivasan <prpoint@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > dear friends
> >
> > Today (10th Dec) is the Human Rights Day, observed in all the
countries.
> > One thing, i am not able to understand is as to why the Human
Rights
> > evangelists do not raise their voice against the terrorists, who
violate the
> > human rights by killing innocent people.
> >
> > At the same time, many of the Human Rights organisations raised
their voice
> > while forest brigand veerappan was shot dead by the Police.
They made big
> > hue and cry and they did not talk about the people killed by
Veerappan.
> >
> > In another recent instance, there was a big campaign from the
Human Rights
> > activists to reduce the punishment to Nalini, assassin of Rajiv
Gandhi,
> > giving the reason that she had a daughter. But they did not
raise their
> > voice against the LTTE, who killed more than 20 people (police
officials and
> > innocent party workers) along with Rajiv Gandhi. Don't they
think that the
> > victims of such terrorism have also family members.
> >
> > It is sad, that none of the Human Rights associations have
condemned the
> > Mumbai terror attack. Probably, they are waiting to give
statement in
> > favour of the arrested terrorist, for providing 5 star hotel
food, air
> > conditioned jail, etc. They are more seen as supporters of
wrong doers,
> > including terrorists. I may be wrong. this is the general
perception of
> > the many citizens.
> >
> > Can any of the Human Rights evangelists in this group set right
the
> > perception.
> >
> > Srinivasan
> > Moderator
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> J P
> J.Prabhakar,
> Ennangalin Sangamam,
> D-4, Varasidhi Vinayagar Apts,
> 10, 5 th Cross Street,
> Trustpuram, Chennai - 600 024.
> Mob: 94449 08317.
>

__._,_.___
Please visit the website http://www.indiavision2020.org to read inspiring articles of eminent personalities
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Y! Messenger

Want a quick chat?

Chat over IM with

group members.

Ads on Yahoo!

Learn more now.

Reach customers

searching for you.

Yahoo! Groups

Do More For Dogs Group

Join a group of dog owners

who do more.

.

__,_._,___
Share:

0 comments:

Latest Messages

Blog Archive

India Vision Team


Publisher and Patron
K. Srinivasan,
Team:
Shivanarayan Pasupathy
Jayatheerthan
Balamurugan
Subha Ganesh
Contact
prpoint@gmail.com

India Vision website and ezine

India Vision website offers lot of information about the various aspects of Vision 2020. Please download the ezines and podcasts on this theme. Please visit http://www.indiavision2020.org

India Vision Group



India Vision 2020 is the largest Indian group for youth to discuss the strategies for realising the devleoped India by 2020. This Blog carries the feed from the India Vision discussion group. Please join the group by clicking
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/India_Vision_2020/

Blog Archive